GB Group LLC faced a daunting challenge when our insured's truck was involved in an accident that totaled another truck’s trailer, which was carrying a high-value, one-of-a-kind cargo. The potential liability was staggering, with the cargo being valued at $500,000.
In a case involving a trucking company that presented a sizable loss of use claim exceeding $100,000 due to an accident, GB Group LLC was put to the test. The claimant company bolstered their claim with invoices from another company, arguing that standard equipment couldn’t be used and that renting the specialized equipment was the only way for them to sustain their business.
GB Group LLC was faced with a subrogation claim from a well respected insurance company for repairs and towing of severely damaged cargo. The other insurer had paid substantial fees for towing, as the load was classified as overweight and oversized. These towing fees constituted half of the entire subrogation claim. Our adjuster, however, sensed that something wasn’t adding up and decided to meticulously review all the evidence at hand.
In a property damage case where our policyholder was evidently liable for damages to the claimant's vehicle, something seemed amiss regarding the nature of the damages in relation to the accident mechanics. Although the appraiser who was sent to assess the vehicle did not pinpoint any issues, our GB Group LLC adjuster’s instinct told them that a more thorough investigation was needed.
In an accident claim where the policyholder was clearly liable, our GB Group LLC adjuster received a substantial six-figure demand for injuries alleged to have significantly reduced the claimant’s mobility of back and neck. On the surface, the claim appeared to be straightforward. However, the seasoned adjuster knew the importance of thoroughness in examining every piece of evidence.
In a catastrophic accident involving multiple fatalities, the gravity of the situation was colossal. Our large loss adjusters at GB Group LLC were faced with an intricate web of conflicting accounts and a police report that offered no clarity. With lives lost and families devastated, emotions ran high, and the onus was on our team to handle this delicate situation with the utmost professionalism, care and integrity. The plaintiffs initially sought substantial contributions from shippers and the trucking company well beyond the policy limit.
In a high-stakes case involving life-changing injuries, an attorney's demand for policy limits totaling $1 million was underpinned by extensive treatment and significant outstanding medical bills. The claimant had become unemployed and disabled as a result of the accident and was not expected to return to work for several years. The accident involved our client’s insured truck allegedly striking a forklift, pinning the operator to a wall, and causing severe injuries.
One witness, a contractor, provided a statement to the police officer claiming that our client’s insured vehicle had disregarded the red light. The initial analysis of the situation seemed like a 50/50 split in liability, which could have significantly impacted our client's claim. The challenge was to investigate the conflicting statements and ascertain the true sequence of events.